Archive for the ‘ESET’ Category

Changing Passwords: Should You Pass On It?

Thursday, April 15th, 2010

I’m seeing a lot of traffic about a story in the Boston Globe and taken up elsewhere suggesting that changing passwords is “a waste of time”. Well, actually, the study by Cormac Herley doesn’t exactly say that, and I suggest that you read the actual study to see what it does say. It’s actually well worth reading and makes some excellent points, though it’s not a particularly new paper, and some of the points it makes are much older. 

Should you stop changing passwords? Well, you probably don’t have much choice, in general. You should certainly use strong passwords, where possible (some systems actively work against you in that respect, by only accepting limited password options). Randy Abrams and I wrote a paper for ESET last year that discussed some password strategies, and one of the points made there was: 

 ”It’s sometimes useful to consider whether frequent changes are really necessary or desirable. After all, if you’re encouraging the use of good password selection and resistance to social engineering attacks, and making it difficult for an attacker to use unlimited login attempts, a good password should remain a safe password for quite a while.”

I don’t think that the “change passwords every thirty days” mantra has been as universally enthused over by security specialists as the Globe suggests. System administrators (not always the same thing as security specialists) do often enforce such measures, of course. But while I was working on some notes for a journalist today on social engineering, I came across this quote in a paper I presented at EICAR in 1998. (I’ll have to put that paper up somewhere: it’s actually not bad, and not particularly outdated.)

“Documented research into social engineering hasn’t kept pace with dialogue between practitioners, let alone with real-world threats. Of course password stealing is important, but it’s [also] important not to think of social engineering as being concerned exclusively with ways of saying “Open, sesame…..”

Even within this very limited area, there is scope for mistrusting received wisdom. No-one doubts the importance of secure passwords in most computing environments, though the efficacy of passwording as a long-term solution to user authentication could be the basis of a lively discussion. Still, that’s what most systems rely on. It’s accepted that frequent password changes make it harder for an intruder to guess a given user’s password. However, they also make it harder for the user to remember his/her password. He/she is thus encouraged to attempt subversive strategies such as:

  • changing a password by some easily guessed technique such as adding 1, 2, 3 etc. to the password they had before the latest enforced change.
  • changing a password several times in succession so that the password history expires, allowing them to revert to a previously held password.
  • using the same password on several systems and changing them all at the same time so as to cut down on the number of passwords they need to remember.
  • aides-memoire such as PostIts, notes in the purse, wallet or personal organizer, biro on the back of the wrist…..

How much data is there which ‘validates’ ‘known truths’ like “frequent password changes make it harder for an intruder to guess a given user’s password”? Do we need to examine such ‘received wisdom more closely?”

Nor do I claim that those thoughts were particularly original: luminaries like Gene Spafford and Bruce Schneier have made similar observations. That doesn’t mean you should accept uncritically what they, or I, say. But it’s always worth wondering if received wisdom is really wise.

And as Neil Rubenking points out, an attacker isn’t going to waste time on trying to crack your password with brute force if he can trick you into telling it to him, or into running a keylogger. Which takes me right back to that social engineering paper… [Update: now available at http://smallbluegreenblog.wordpress.com/2010/04/16/re-floating-the-titanic-social-engineering-paper/]

David Harley FBCS CITP CISSP
AVIEN Chief Operations Officer
ESET Research Fellow & Director of Malware Intelligence
Mac Virus
Small Blue-Green World

Also blogging at:
http://www.eset.com/blog
http://avien.net/blog/
http://smallbluegreenblog.wordpress.com/
http://blogs.securiteam.com
http://blog.isc2.org/
http://dharley.wordpress.com
http://chainmailcheck.wordpress.com
http://amtso.wordpress.com

That’s it, I’m Out of Here…

Thursday, January 7th, 2010

John Ozimek of The Register has pointed out some issues around blogging, journalism and freedom of speech in an article called “It’s official: Blogging is a dangerous business”.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/07/blogging_report/ 

He’s referring to a report published by Reporters Sans Frontieres at:

http://www.rsf.org/IMG/pdf/Bilan_2009_GB_BD.pdf.

Of course, when you compare the figures for casualties of one sort or another for “real” journalists, the trend looks less dramatic (for instance, one blogger died in prison whereas 76 journalists are reported as having been killed). However, there is a distinct and alarming upward trend: nearly three times as many bloggers and “cyber-dissidents” were arrested in 2009: 151 as compared to 59 in 2008. Similarly, physical assaults on bloggers went up by 35%, and the number of countries affected by online censorship went up by 62%.

Fortunately for me, my geographical location and the nature of the work I do spares me most of those risks, though I suspect that there are one or two testers who wouldn’t mind slapping me round a bit. ;-)

That’s not to say that there aren’t less dramatic risks to being a blogger, though: I pointed out some of them in an AVAR paper last year.
http://preview.tinyurl.com/ylfu3e6 

Still, compared to the 30 journalists killed in a single day in the Phillipines, the odd flame from other bloggers, commenters, and the occasional suit doesn’t seem to bad.

Which reminds me that we don’t seem to have any takers for AVIEN members to swell our blogger population so far. C’mon, live dangerously! :)

David Harley FBCS CITP CISSP
Chief Operations Officer, AVIEN
Director of Malware Intelligence, ESET

Also blogging at:
http://www.eset.com/threat-center/blog
http://smallbluegreenblog.wordpress.com/
http://blogs.securiteam.com
http://blog.isc2.org/
http://dharley.wordpress.com

‘Tis the season for crystal balls…

Tuesday, December 29th, 2009

And yes, I’m working on a crystal ball document today for ESET, making use of Randy Abram’s blog at http://www.eset.com/threat-center/blog/2009/12/14/que-sera-sera-%e2%80%93-a-buffet-of-predications-for-2010 and ESET Latin America’s extensive document (already published in Spanish at http://eset-la.com/centro-amenazas/2256-tendencias-eset-malware-2010). But marketing departments and the media like that sort of thing.

In fact, many such articles are essentially retreads rather than dramatically insightful. However, Anton Chuvakin posted a blog yesterday that shows not only insight, as I’d expect, but a certain panache. Not that I wouldn’t expect that too. :)

http://chuvakin.blogspot.com/2009/12/security-predictions-2010.html

David Harley FBCS CITP CISSP
Chief Operations Officer, AVIEN
Director of Malware Intelligence, ESET

Also blogging at:
http://www.eset.com/threat-center/blog
http://dharley.wordpress.com/
http://blogs.securiteam.com
http://blog.isc2.org/

Paedophilia and the Trojan (or SODDI) Defence

Thursday, November 26th, 2009

I just had a look at the tricky issue of the “Some Other Dude Did It” defence against conviction for downloading/possessing child pornography. Not an issue on which I want to expend two lengthy blog articles in one day, so I’ll just give you the pointer to the ESET blog.

http://www.eset.com/threat-center/blog/2009/11/26/paedophilia-and-the-trojan-defence
David Harley FBCS CITP CISSP
Chief Operations Officer, AVIEN
Director of Malware Intelligence, ESET

Also blogging at:
http://www.eset.com/threat-center/blog
http://dharley.wordpress.com/
http://blogs.securiteam.com
http://blog.isc2.org/

Lawyers in Love

Saturday, November 14th, 2009

One minute I was saying “…AMTSO in Prague next week…” and the next Prague was long gone, and so was AVAR in Kyoto. Hopefully, though, that was my last long trip for this year, and I’ll get into the habit of blogging regularly here. Well, I suppose once every blue moon is regular. ;-)

This is a bit of a cheat, since I already blogged it for ESET, but I’m a believer in green blogging with lots of recycling. Juraj Malcho, head of ESET’s virus lab in Bratislava, did an excellent paper and presentation at VB 2009 on “Is there a lawyer in the lab?”: it’s about the complications that ensue when the authors of Possibly Unwanted Applications and other blahware try to tie up anti-malware companies in legal process for daring to detect it as Something Not Very Useful. 

I think I may have just coined blahware: in this case, I’m referring not to those irritating Facebook applets that so many of my friends are addicted to, but to software which, if not actively malicious, is nevertheless of more value to its author than to anyone who’s misled into paying for it, and is distributed by semi-malicious channels such as spam or push-installations. I’d call it irrelevantware, but that’s not so catchy. And come to think of it, it probably does apply to most Facebook apps.

Anyway, the paper is at :

http://www.eset.com/download/whitepapers/Lawyer_in_the_lab.pdf,

The slide deck is at:

 http://www.eset.com/download/whitepapers/is-there-a-lawyer-in-the-lab.pdf.

Well worth looking at, and we don’t ask you for your email address when you download them, either. :)

David Harley CISSP FBCS CITP
Chief Operations Officer, AVIEN

Also blogging at:
http://dharley.wordpress.com/
http://www.eset.com/threat-center/blog
http://blogs.securiteam.com
http://blog.isc2.org/